Homes and schools should not be built next to power lines
because of grave health risks to children
As many as 100,000 homes sit within this 'danger zone' which
previous studies have shown can trigger fatal diseases in adults and
children alike.
Governments have resisted previous calls for action because
expert opinion had been divided on the scale of risk.
But the new report, published by SAGE, a collective of academics,
medical charities and representatives of the electricity industry,
points to compelling evidence of serious health dangers.
It says that childhood leukaemia is the biggest threat for
families living near power lines. A quarter of the 400 children who
contract the disease each year die.
The report cites a list of other linked illnesses and conditions
including breast and brain cancer, miscarriage and Alzheimer's
disease.
It will stoke fears - as yet unproved - about the safety of
common electrical devices such as mobile phones and computers.
The concerns focus on the electric and magnetic fields produced
wherever electricity is generated, transmitted or used.
SAGE plans to write another report on the health effects of
electricity substations which are thought to generate strong
electromagnetic fields.
People are thought to be most at risk if they live within 65
yards of a high-voltage power line - although the 'danger zone' can
extend up to 160 yards. Smaller wooden pole power lines - a common
sight in the countryside - are not a risk, the report says.
No rules prevent homes or schools from being built "right up to
and indeed underneath overhead lines", the report warned.
In other countries, including Australia, all new power lines are
built underground.
SAGE, which was formed in 2004 with the task of advising the
Government, says a ban is the 'best-available option' for cutting
the risk.
"We urge Government to make a clear decision on whether to
implement this option or not," it concluded.
SAGE did not call for stronger action because there were major
differences of opinion between members.
But some campaigners said a blanket ban was a matter of urgency.
Michael Jayne, of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors,
one of the groups represented, said: "The Government should
legislate to avoid any potential health risks from overhead higher
voltage power lines."
Alasdair Philips, of the campaign group Powerwatch, said: "The
evidence is now overwhelming that building homes near to power lines
isn't a clever thing to do."
The charity Children with Leukaemia said a 65-yard ban was "an
absolute minimum" and called for a cordon of 220 yards.
Yesterday the Department of Health said: "The Government will
need time to consider the implications of the report's conclusions
and recommendations."
Denis Henshaw, professor of human radiation effects at the
University of Bristol, and another member of the group, said the
report should have been more forthright.
He said laboratory studies clearly showed that magnetic fields
enhance the effects of cancer-causing agents in humans.
The report also raised concerns about the electric and magnetic
fields inside the home caused by radios, televisions and even
washing machines and cookers.
It called for the Government to advise householders on reducing
risks, for example by moving electrical equipment away from the
bedside. Equipment manufacturers should also investigate how to
limit electric and magnetic fields, the authors said.
Some of the most dramatic evidence of the dangers of overhead
power lines comes from Stoke.
A survey of just 67 households living within 50 yards of
high-voltage cables there found one case of childhood leukaemia and
11 of other types of cancer.
No cases of the disease were found in a similar group of homes
well away from the power lines.
The 67 homes reported 18 miscarriages, compared with just one in
the control group, as well as higher rates of depression, digestive
problems and insomnia.
Although the research was not carried out by scientists, the
study - undertaken by the Trentham Action Group - formed part of the
Sage group's inquiries.
Linda Tatton's son David Smith, 7, died from leukaemia while she
was living in the shadow of a pylon in the Trentham area of Stoke in
1979.
Yesterday she said: "Ever since David's death I've been convinced
power lines were to blame, and if this report spares other families
from going through the pain we did I'll be very pleased."
David's death was one of two cases of childhood leukaemia
uncovered by the group's work.
The 67-household survey, carried out in nearby Werrington, also
uncovered a series of health problems suffered by the family of shop
assistant Angela Gasken. Her family has lived directly under power
cables since the 1960s.
Mrs Gasken's brother died of leukaemia aged 18 months shortly
after their mother died of kidney failure. Their father died of
heart failure ten years ago and Mrs Gasken has suffered two
miscarriages.
"It's a strong possibility that the lines caused my
miscarriages," she said. "It is very frightening. I have suffered
depression too and it wouldn't surprise me if that is linked."
DISCLAIMER:The information in HeatTreat.ca is not intended as a substitute for appropriate medical professional help or advice but is to be used as a sharing of new knowledge, information and as an aid to a new understanding about back and neck pain and its treatment. A trained, appropriate health professional should always be consulted for back pain or any health problem. HeatTreat.ca provides links to other articles and web sites as a service to our readers and is not responsible for the information, services, or products provided by these web sites, health professionals, or companies. See "Terms and
Conditions" for use of this Site